if you are ever offered a choice either to live here with material wealth and an oath to the supreme darkness to exist or to be liberated from here - fail to take the oath and get a brutal torture or death -personally the choice is up to u and u only if you want to choose whatever you will but I will state this - one hour in the most beautiful realms is far moar superior than living here forever with all your riches and millions -what has god given me? well my kittie you have yet to discover that yet why would you turn down something you know so little about? sadly a lot of young people are fast tracked to live an eternity in this place
I got a stark warning in my 20's when I paid for a psychic
If you ever choose the dark side, you will lose everything you have gained....
I will never choose that shit and oil and stink realm ever fuck that
just when you become a freemason you are fast tracked into the new world order
and the hell realms are able to be travelled by freemasons
I know you are all in pain kitties
I know this place is 20x more challenging of when I was 20 (I am 42 now)
Just think your way out of everything
meditate for 20 min on something big
you should never be rushed into things
honestly only the idiots would choose to live here forever with $400,000,000,000
at all times....don't be one of the 100% that they have market researched across galaxies to choose what everyone else is doing
when you get to the end point...
its just you at the huge doors
not your momma, not your boyfriend its just you.....
don't be afraid
choose good and greatness and patience
and you will always be protected and guided
we are all here to learn about our mistakes that caused deaths in this life and others
but have faith that no matter how much they shame and humiliate you
you are always welcome with the most highest energy
so many we have lost because they were shamed into not accepting good
we are all given this evil realm due to the collective hells of slaughterhouses
we have to remain diligent and honest in our choice making
when I was 14-22 yrs old I was brazen crazy and totally whacked
but I have lived through it all
worked my butt off to make a life for myself
and I was pre meds and pre diagnosis
I came from a life of abuse and chaos and trauma
and it has been a lonely painful struggle
crying beside a car in banff all night because all the hostels and hotels were closed not knowing how the hell I got there or what my motivations were
I just vowed to make better choices out of my pain
I did not want to continue trauma abuse and pain on others
simple.
Guru z3n8 is an Epic Ethical Art Hacker ::: This.. ladies & gentle freaks is -> FUCKTALK, on Ha.ck.er N3ws: Ending our third party fact-checking program and moving to Community Notes model https://ift.tt/cODEvK6
New moaning and creaming orgasmic story on Hack3r News: Ending our third party fact-checking program and moving to Community Notes model https://ift.tt/IwA6ND0
Worldwide ACLU Edict : We're Fighting Back Against Efforts to Intimidate Professors into Silence
ACLU: We're Fighting Back Against Efforts to Intimidate Professors into Silence https://ift.tt/pEuqtMT
Last Spring, protests related to the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict engulfed universities across the country, with students and faculty weighing in on both sides of the issue. The ACLU expressed its strong opposition to any efforts to stifle free speech and association on college campuses.
During student protests at Columbia University in April 2024, the Columbia chapter of the American Association of University Professors (Columbia-AAUP), an organization of Columbia University faculty, issued a public statement condemning the school’s punitive response to students protesting the war in Gaza. The statement minced no words, describing then-President Minouche Shafik’s unilateral decision to authorize the NYPD to arrest student protestors as “a grotesque violation of norms of shared governance.” It described Shafik as “inaugurating a new era at Columbia,” marked by “repressed speech, political restrictions on academic inquiry, and punitive discipline against the University’s own students and faculty.” Columbia-AAUP, whose mission is to protect academic freedom and advocate for faculty and students, pledged to provide “continued support for our students’ right to protest and to speak freely, and for our colleagues’ right to teach and to write freely within their domains of expertise.”
Two months later, five current and former Columbia students filed a civil lawsuit in New York against Columbia AAUP in response to this and similar statements. The lawsuit names 21 people and organizations — including Columbia students and faculty, student organizations, the UAW, and three members of Congress — who publicly protested the war in Gaza or who made public statements in support of student protestors.
On behalf of Columbia-AAUP, the ACLU and the civil rights firm Wang Hecker LLP filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit and to order the plaintiffs to pay our client’s legal fees. We argue that the lawsuit is a clear example of a SLAPP, or “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.” These cases weaponize our legal system to punish and silence constitutionally-protected speech.
SLAPP lawsuits have become a common tool for intimidating and silencing criticism—including from whistleblowers, journalists, and political protestors. The real goal of a SLAPP suit is not necessarily to win in court, but to entangle people in expensive litigation, using the prospect of mounting legal fees and a potentially ruinous financial penalty to chill speech. In other words, to bully people into silence.
The plaintiffs claim that because Columbia-AAUP spoke in support of student protestors, it somehow injured them by causing Columbia University to move classes online, restrict campus access, and cancel commencement. The plaintiffs have sued Columbia-AAUP for purported monetary and punitive damages resulting from Columbia University’s actions.
If this feels like a logical leap, that's because it is.
Fortunately, New York State—along with 33 other states and the District of Columbia—has an “anti-SLAPP” law specifically designed to protect those whose speech is targeted by such meritless lawsuits. Under New York’s law, a defendant may quickly move to dismiss a lawsuit based on public speech in connection with any issue of public interest—like a statement from professors about the treatment of student protesters on their campus. In a typical civil lawsuit, the defendant must prove that the case has no legal basis in order to dismiss it at the outset. By contrast, the anti-SLAPP law shifts the burden to the plaintiff to prove that there is a “substantial basis” for the claims. If the plaintiff cannot meet this burden, the court must not only dismiss the case, but also order the plaintiff to pay the defendant’s attorney’s fees. The purpose of the fee award is to ensure the defendant is not left with a hefty financial burden simply from fighting off a frivolous case and to dissuade others from filing such lawsuits in the future.
Columbia-AAUP’s case is exactly the type of lawsuit anti-SLAPP laws are designed to quickly dismiss and deter. The allegations against Columbia-AAUP focus exclusively on public statements that the faculty organization made in support of students’ rights to free speech and criticizing Columbia’s crackdown, including using the NYPD, on protesting students. These are issues of clear public interest; indeed, they have captured national attention. And it is clear there is no “substantial basis” for holding Columbia-AAUP liable for this speech, when there is no plausible connection between Columbia-AAUP’s words and Columbia University’s reaction to the student protestors.
Throughout American history, students have participated in and benefited from the marketplace of ideas on college campuses, particularly with respect to pressing and divisive social and political issues. Columbia University itself has frequently been a site of vibrant student protest, including with respect to the Vietnam War, South African Apartheid, and climate change. In this case, the unnamed plaintiffs are free to disagree with the student protestors’ message and those who defended their rights to free speech, but they cannot hold them legally liable for engaging in the rich tradition of dissent that characterizes American campuses.
At the ACLU, we won’t stand for SLAPP lawsuits that imperil this historic tradition and threaten the First Amendment rights of future generations of students, professors, and activists. New York’s anti-SLAPP law, and the First Amendment, clearly protect Columbia-AAUP’s speech–and we are confident that the court will send a clear message that New York will not allow abuse of the legal system to silence viewpoints simply because some people don’t like them.
is this entire simulation due to end on trumps inaguaration day of Jan 20? I don't know but if it does about 92% of people have not even accomplished literally anything in life but service the multi level marketing pyramid scheme
They have not snared my soul as being the only anomaly after keanu reeves
unfortunately for him he gave into their demands and sold off his soul for money
their stuff never stuck with me, it seemed void of any real emotion
they spent "decades" trying to get me to take the curse of the freemasons, it did not work
so they are working with hypotheticals and hollywood and advanced satanists
that will catastrophically bring down north america and quite possibly the entire world simply because they have gone "over budget" trying to accomplish what they were so successful over countless of times before me.....what I do know is that the world is hungry for another michael jackson, michael alig and sai baba they want something of substance and pure love that has not signed damaging soul contracts with the devil. they have failed and they will bring down the entire system just to own my singular soul
it wont work -I have so many places to go after here - I have worked for over 22 years 18-19 hours a day at my recovery and healing. sorry you all failed miserably have fun in an eternity of hell because you all are simply not welcome where I am going - not many people are....whether it is when I am 90 or tomorrow I feel I have hated god every single hour but also fought for something so incredible which is this power that I hate so much - I feel sorry for you all because none of you are coming with me....every single being here no matter how rich they are is too evil for the peace matrix in which I am the emissary of
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)