oh he ate all of irans food? fucken goof

 

fucken bunch of goofs keep ur sex acts to urself

 

glad I got a hefty and affordable loan before they close that off to people thankfully I had enough good credit but like felt like a financial interrogation getting it hahaha but like totally upgraded my life more got more food cache better tenants insurance a ton of stuff for my work gigs that makes it easier a few goodies for myself stocked myself up in sL and paid off 3 credit cards and a small overdraft and closed the accts and paid off a cash loan and 2 consumer product loans and two cool courses that will boost my credentials in my chosen field all for $50 more than I was paying with all that shit they say skills is like the #1 best investment not to mention a safety and emergency fund now in case I need it tucked away online like tbh a lot of those debts were ok and manageable but like the money was flying all over the place and some of it $250 was only transactional so not cash it just made for some nice surprises a few months lmao like oh yeah cant use that money cause its not good enough lol so many just cant handle this financial system usually its just a lack of cash not poor money management lol since i paid off my consumer company I now have $3200 in credit for "cool stuff" and about $1600 in cash in case I need it but will not use it lol just better of saving for things now instead of 68 payments a month hahaha

 Its nice knowing that with a super good credit score I could take out a couple loans if I really need them just paying off some rank credit cards was my #1 goal and starting to invest in crypto and stocks is gonna help too I like investing now cause you like have $4 and can launch it at your investments and never think about it I have an intermediate knowledge of finances since I have listened to hundreds of shows on the ramsey debt show so a real solid understanding of where i want to be financially hahaha so many are taking out credit to prepare for the end of the world but I have to say your needs lessen with a 3-6 month emergency food cache in case the stores close or whatever and if WW3 hits you can buy one item at a time not like 60 things in a mad rush to get yourself stocked up  but its the little things like throwing money at all aspects of your life until you see some liberation and you feel after a few thousand you like have no worries lmao its great officially not a 44 year old twink anymore have entered young daddie territory its funny passed a muscle hunk today and I did not like oggle his muscles and large cock just walked on his life is probably a mess spending all his time on his body who knows but most of them are and need that constant looks maxxing their way for their egos they are the #1 objects of rich males lol 

 

BREAKING🚨 Trump’s handpicked attorney general just went on Fox News to claim there’s a “TON of evidence” the 2020 election was rigged — and in the same breath admitted he can’t promise there will ever be proof or charges. On Sunday Morning Futures, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche sat down with Maria Bartiromo and fed Trump’s base exactly what they wanted to hear. He said the Department of Justice is “actively investigating” the 2020 election in multiple states and that there is “a ton of evidence” it was rigged against Trump. He name‑dropped Arizona and Fulton County, Georgia, and suggested local officials are “very good at hiding misconduct,” which is why this supposed evidence hasn’t surfaced yet. Then Bartiromo asked the obvious question: if there’s so much proof, why hasn’t the DOJ shown any of it to the public? Blanche’s answer was a word salad. He claimed there have been “many, many years” of evidence, but admitted he couldn’t say when — or even if — the department would be able to present a case. At one point he flatly said he’s “not going to promise there’s going to be a definitive answer” on whether the election was stolen. In other words: trust us, it was rigged, but don’t expect us to actually prove it. Put that next to reality. Since 2020, more than 60 lawsuits by Trump and his allies have been tossed out by state and federal judges, including Trump appointees, for complete lack of credible evidence. Republican officials in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania and elsewhere — many of them Trump voters — have certified that their elections were free, fair, and not marred by widespread fraud. Independent fact‑checks and state reviews have turned up at most a few hundred questionable ballots in key states, nowhere near enough to change the outcome. Yet here we are, nearly six years later, with the nation’s top law‑enforcement official effectively turning the Justice Department into a press office for the Big Lie. Blanche dangled “ongoing investigations” and hinted that in a couple of weeks the American people might hear something about what they’ve “uncovered,” carefully phrasing it so he can walk it back later if nothing materializes. It’s the same script we’ve seen over and over since 2020: big promises, no proof, and just enough conspiracy buzz to keep the base angry and suspicious of democracy itself. This is not about finding the truth. If there were a “ton of evidence,” it would have shown up in court years ago. This is about keeping a grievance alive, intimidating election workers and officials in places like Arizona and Georgia, and setting the stage to delegitimize any future loss.

 

In America, you could kill a gay man and avoid prison by simply saying he flirted with you. In some places, you still can. It has a name: the "gay panic defense." It was never a formal standalone statute in most states. It was a courtroom strategy. Defense lawyers argued that an unwanted same-sex advance, a kiss, or simply discovering someone was gay or trans sent a straight person into such profound shock and humiliation that violence became understandable. And juries bought it. Trans people have faced the same weapon. Defendants claimed that discovering someone was trans caused them to snap. That claim has shadowed multiple homicide trials involving trans women, especially trans women of color, who have always been the most expendable in the eyes of the legal system. Killers walked with lesser punishment or none at all because prejudice got dressed up in the language of psychology and passed off as reason. The message was brutal and simple: queer and trans lives are worth less. Our very existence could be reframed as provocation. You can trace this logic back decades, but one of the most notorious examples came after the 1998 murder of Matthew Shepard. His killers floated the idea that sexual advances triggered the attack. The facts told a far uglier story. But the instinct to blame the victim and center the attacker's discomfort was already familiar to anyone paying attention. The good news is the wall has cracked. 20 states plus DC have passed laws restricting or banning panic defenses based on sexual orientation and gender identity. But not every state has moved. In some places, versions of this argument still crawl through older provocation rules or get smuggled in through jury strategy. Thankfully, the list of states that ban it is growing. This isn't ancient history. For years, courts have treated queer people as the threat and their murderers as the wounded party. It's a reminder to us all that equality isn't just marriage licenses and rainbow logos. It's whether the law sees your life as fully human when it matters most.

 

 

Two women built a life together, shared a home, split expenses, and never answered to a man. In the late 1800s, they called it a “Boston marriage.” There was no ceremony or paperwork. No apology either. A “Boston marriage” meant two financially independent women choosing each other over the script. They lived together for decades, traveled, hosted salons, and wrote each other into their wills. Some were romantic. Some were not. Many were both, depending on who was asking and how honest you think history was willing to be. The name comes from Boston, where women’s colleges and inherited wealth made this kind of independence possible. You didn’t need a husband to pay the bills, so you didn’t need a husband at all. Take Jane Addams and Mary Rozet Smith (pictured). They shared a home, a bed on trips, and a life that spanned decades. Addams wrote to Smith, “You are always a comfort to me.” Historians still argue over labels. The letters don't. Or Sarah Orne Jewett and Annie Adams Fields, who hosted literary circles and built a partnership that outlasted most marriages of the time. They were read as respectable. They were also inseparable. Society let this happen because it didn’t take women seriously enough to police them the way it policed men. Two women could be dismissed as “companions,” which gave them cover. That was the loophole. It was also fragile. As the 20th century rolled in, the space that Boston marriages occupied started to close. Independence began to look suspicious. Society became less tolerant. Call it friendship if that makes you comfortable. The rest of us can read between the lines.

 

 

 

 

Guru z3n8 is an Epic Ethical Art Hacker ::: This.. ladies & gentle freaks is -> FUCKTALK, on Ha.ck.er N3ws: Native all the way, until you need text https://ift.tt/v38NyJt

New moaning and creaming orgasmic story on Hack3r News: Native all the way, until you need text https://ift.tt/ZmEngS4