BREAKING🚨🏳️‍🌈 ICE is trying to DEPORT a Gay Man from West Hollywood to a country where gay sex is punishable by LIFE IN PRISON. “They’re going to kill me,” Alex Pereira-Alves told his friend, sobbing. For years, Alex had built a life in Southern California, working as a security guard and personal trainer. His dog Bella is the center of his world. He continued reporting to immigration officials as required. His next ICE check-in wasn't even supposed to happen until November. Then Monday, an ICE officer suddenly called and ordered him to report downtown the very next morning. Alex showed up. Within five minutes, agents handcuffed him. His attorney says ICE told him: “We know you can't be sent to Brazil, but we found Guyana who's willing to take you.” There was a reason ICE couldn't send him to Brazil. In 2018, an immigration judge ruled that Alex could NOT be deported back there because he feared violence. So he remained in Southern California under government supervision. Now ICE had found somewhere else. Alex isn't Guyanese. He has never even been to Guyana. And Guyana is the only country in South America that still criminalizes sex between men. Human rights groups have documented LGBTQ people there being beaten, murdered and harassed. Police have reportedly used the country's anti-gay law to intimidate men simply for being perceived as gay, while LGBTQ people have feared going to police after experiencing violence. That is the country ICE chose for Alex. ICE transferred him to the Adelanto detention center and prepared to deport him there. His attorneys raced to federal court. A judge has now temporarily BLOCKED ICE from sending Alex to Guyana while his case is reviewed. But Alex isn't home. He's still locked inside Adelanto, and DHS says he remains in custody pending removal. If you appreciate Gay News, it would mean the world if you followed my page. Thank you for being here.

BREAKING🚨 United Airlines used a fake gate announcement to lure a woman straight into an ICE arrest.

Patience Gore, a 44-year-old Zimbabwean woman who has lived in the United States for about 24 years, was flying home to Maryland with her husband after a friend’s wedding in Arizona.

According to reporting by Morgan Fischer of Phoenix New Times, they had checked their bags, cleared security and were waiting for their delayed United flight when the airport speakers suddenly started calling her name:

“Passenger Patience Gore, please come to the gate.”

When she walked up to the United counter, three men approached her.

“Ma’am, you’re going to need to come with us.”

They were ICE agents.

According to court filings, the men showed no visible identification. Her husband says agents showed him a warrant with no judge’s signature.

Gore had no criminal record. She was complying with her ICE check-ins. And an immigration judge had already ruled that she could NOT be deported to Zimbabwe because her life or freedom could be in danger there.

ICE arrested her anyway.

She spent nearly two weeks in immigration detention, where she says she slept on a mattress on the floor, had no change of clothes and had to use an exposed toilet.

Gore was also undergoing IVF treatment to try to have another child when she was arrested.

Once ICE detained her, she couldn’t continue the medications, monitoring and procedures required for the treatment. Four days later, her attorney asked ICE to release her on humanitarian grounds.

ICE never responded.

According to the lawsuit, Gore was forced to abandon that IVF cycle. After her release, she tried again.

That cycle produced no viable embryo.

Less than two weeks after ICE arrested her at the airport, a federal judge ordered her released.

If you appreciate my posts, it would mean the world if you followed my page. Thank you for being here.

 

 

Our tiniest rescue ever arrived today, although “arrived” may be too generous a word for someone found stranded high on a shelf among a pile of tools we happened to be rooting around in. This impossibly tiny baby mouse, smaller than a thumb, was so cold, hungry and exhausted that he could barely move. We scooped him up, tucked him into a warmer, and waited while the heat slowly returned to his body. Before long, he began grooming his little face, putting both hands into a dish of food and taking in the hydration and calories he desperately needed. Mice are among the animals we are taught to classify as pests: lives to trap, poison or dispose of without much thought. But place one tiny, shivering baby in front of someone and that category becomes much harder to defend. He was not an infestation or an inconvenience. He was one vulnerable individual, alone and in trouble, doing everything he could to stay alive. Most people know Broken Shovels as a farmed animal sanctuary. We are not a wildlife rescue, and we are closed to intake because caring properly for the hundreds of residents already here requires everything we have. But Broken Shovels has also always been a place for the underserved, the unloved and those for whom few, or no resources exist. Farmed animals themselves have long occupied that category. Many people still struggle to understand why a cow, chicken or goat would need rescue at all. To many, they are just “food”. The little mouse in our warmer is not so different. His species may be different, but the reason he was nearly left without help is painfully familiar: people have not collectively decided that a life like his is worth creating resources to protect. This year alone, babies found injured or orphaned on our own 20 acres have included three pigeons, seven baby rats and three baby mice. We did not seek them out, and no one formally brought them here for intake. They were simply placed in our path, sometimes quite literally, and there was no one else coming to help. We feel compelled to step in, but that compassion has a real operational cost. Every unexpected rehabilitation means warmers, enclosures, specialized food, medications, cleaning and hours of hands-on care. Those hours come from the same finite days in which we must medicate and feed hundreds of sanctuary residents, manage the property, coordinate volunteers and do the fundraising necessary to keep Broken Shovels alive. The work that sustains the sanctuary is often the first thing pushed aside when a fragile life needs us immediately, because an animal cannot wait while we finish a fundraising campaign. That is one of the quiet realities of this place: even when intake is closed, need continues to find us. There is no closed sign that an injured baby on our own property can read. For now, this tiny one is warm, safe and resting with a full belly. We do not yet know what tomorrow will bring, but tonight he is no longer cold and alone among the tools. He has been seen. He has been cared for. And because someone refused to dismiss him as “just a mouse,” he has a chance.

 

CANADA ALREADY HAS 2-TIER HEALTHCARE. WE JUST PRETEND WE DON’T. Here’s something most Canadians probably don’t know. A national review found at least 85 privately operated clinics in Canada accepting private payment for advanced medical imaging, including MRI, CT, SPECT and PET-CT. And no, they aren’t just in conservative provinces. Quebec: 31 Alberta: 18 British Columbia: 15 Ontario: 14 Saskatchewan: 5 Nova Scotia: 1 New Brunswick: 1 Quebec has more than anywhere else in Canada. (NCBI⁠) So we can stop pretending private healthcare is some foreign concept that might arrive one day. It is already here. Meanwhile, 5.9 million Canadian adults still don’t have regular access to a family doctor, nurse practitioner or primary-care team. (Canadian Medical Association⁠) An estimated 1.4 million Canadians were waiting for medically necessary treatment in 2025, with the median wait from GP referral to treatment reaching 28.6 weeks. (Global News⁠) In our emergency rooms, 1 in 10 patients now spends more than 14 hours in the ER. Another 1.2 million visits ended with the patient leaving before being seen and assessed by a physician in 2024-25. (CIHI⁠) And government records obtained through freedom-of-information requests showed at least 23,746 Canadians died while on waiting lists for surgery or diagnostic scans between April 2024 and March 2025. That does not mean the wait caused every death, but these people died before receiving the care they were waiting for. The data was incomplete in several jurisdictions, so even that number does not capture everyone. (SecondStreet.Org⁠) Yet if you have the money, in parts of Canada you can already pay privately for an MRI or CT instead of relying solely on the public queue. That is two-tier access. I’m not against it. I’m against pretending it doesn’t exist. The real debate shouldn’t be public OR private. It should be: How do we use every doctor, every scanner, every operating room and every dollar available to make sure Canadians get treated faster? Universal healthcare should mean universal access to care. It shouldn’t mean universal access to a waiting list.

 

Elon Musk said something recently that deserves more serious attention than it has received. He said we have approximately three years left — three years — before artificial intelligence renders the exchange of human skill and intelligence for money effectively obsolete. After that, he argues, the world stratifies into a binary: people who own assets — real estate, precious metals, energy resources — and people who don't. Those who don't will receive a universal basic income. A public dividend. A stipend from the machine. I want to sit with what that actually means. Not the technology part — that debate is well underway. But the American part. Because buried inside Musk's prediction is the quiet death of something that has been the foundational promise of this country since its inception. The deal. Not the written deal — not the Constitution or the Declaration. The unwritten deal. The one that every immigrant who ever crossed an ocean, every sharecropper's kid who ever left the South, every first-generation college student who ever borrowed more than they could afford believed in at a cellular level: That what you can do — what you know, what you build, what you contribute — can change the circumstances of your life. Not guaranteed. Not easy. But possible. The possibility was the point. The possibility was America. Musk is saying the possibility is closing. In three years. Let's be precise about what he's actually describing. If the only people who maintain economic autonomy are asset owners — those who hold real estate, precious metals, and energy resources — then we have not entered a new economy. We have returned to a very old one. We have returned to the feudal model. Lords and serfs. Asset holders and dependents. The only difference is that instead of working the land in exchange for protection, the modern serf receives a digital stipend in exchange for — what exactly? Compliance? Consumption? Silence? Universal basic income sounds humane on the surface. And perhaps in its implementation it could be. But as a structural matter, a UBI that replaces the possibility of earned economic mobility is not a safety net. It is a cage with a comfortable floor. The question I keep returning to is this: Is what Musk is describing a prediction or a choice? Because there is a meaningful difference between saying the technology will inevitably produce this outcome and saying the people who control the technology have chosen to build toward this outcome. The asset owners in Musk's framework are not randomly distributed. They are overwhelmingly the people who built, own, and control the AI systems that are displacing human labor. They are, in many cases, the same people telling us that universal basic income is the compassionate response to the disruption they are engineering. There is something worth examining very carefully in that arrangement. The people creating the conditions of dependency are also designing the terms of the dependency. And they are asking us to receive this as generosity. I grew up believing — as most Americans do — that the defining feature of this country was not its geography or its government or even its Constitution. It was the proposition that a person's starting point did not have to be their ending point. That proposition has always been imperfectly realized. The history of who was and wasn't allowed to participate in the exchange is long and painful and unresolved. But the proposition itself — that skill, intelligence, effort, and contribution could translate into changed life circumstances — was the engine of everything. It was what people came here for. It was what generation after generation bet their lives on. What Musk is describing — whether he intends it this way or not — is the formal end of that proposition. Not for asset owners. For everyone else. So I'll ask the question directly: If you are not an asset owner — if you do not hold real estate, precious metals, or energy resources — and your only option in the emerging economy is a universal income paid by the state or by the companies that displaced you, are you free? Or are you a dependent? And is a dependent who receives a stipend instead of a wage meaningfully different from a serf who receives subsistence instead of freedom? I don't ask this to be dramatic. I ask it because I think the answer matters enormously and almost nobody in the current conversation about AI and UBI is willing to say it plainly: A society divided between asset owners and stipend recipients is not a free society. It is a managed one. And the question of who does the managing — and in whose interest — is the only question that matters from here. The American deal was never perfect. But it was a deal. An exchange. You bring something — your mind, your hands, your ideas, your effort — and the economy has an obligation to value it. That deal is being canceled. Not by government. Not by regulation. By the people building the future and choosing, deliberately, what kind of future it will be?

 

 

This flower is in bloom now

 

never hurt a cat or any other animal

 

rich felines are having to cut back in this economy

 

This finch started world war 3

 

NO CROISSANT EATING ALLOWED

 

just a colour block fun fun

 

practice cord cutting in your meditation for politicians exes and other crazy demon attachments