99 years for a doctor. Months for a rapist. This is “pro‑life” in Alabama. In Alabama, a doctor who performs an abortion can be charged with a Class A felony — the same category as murder — and sentenced to up to 99 years in prison. The Human Life Protection Act makes almost every abortion a crime, with no exceptions for r*pe or incest. A physician who helps a 12‑year‑old r*pe survivor end a pregnancy can literally die behind bars for doing their job. Now compare that to how our system has treated actual rapists. Over and over, men who sexually assault unconscious women have walked away with a few months in county jail, or even just probation, because judges say a longer sentence would be “too harsh” or “ruin their life.” The message is sickeningly clear: the state is more eager to cage the doctor who helps a victim than to lock up the man who assaulted her in the first place. This isn’t an accident. It’s the logical result of a movement that talks about “innocent life” while doing almost nothing to protect living, breathing women and girls. Lawmakers had every chance to write laws that throw the book at r*pists. Instead, they poured their energy into laws that threaten OB‑GYNs with decades in prison and scare hospitals into turning away patients in crisis. When a state hands out a possible life sentence for abortion and a slap on the wrist for sexual violence, that state is telling us whose lives matter — and whose don’t.
They cornered a medical student in an alley near the campus mosque at night, mentally tortured him until he named his gay classmates - and then the arrests came. This is what "homosexuality as a crime" looks like in 2026. Not a history lesson. Not a distant relic. Right now - five people were hauled off to jail and four students lost their campus housing, all over allegations of being gay. No trial. No evidence. Just suspicion, extracted under torture. It happened last month at a medical college in Dhaka, Bangladesh - where a colonial-era law criminalizing homosexuality has been on the books since 1860 and carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. The college held an emergency meeting the same night and issued a notice stripping the students of their dorm places, officially citing "suspicion of homosexuality."
Under Canadian constitutional law, Alberta or really any province for that matter just can't up and leave Canada on their own. If they actually wanted to leave legally, they'd need to amend the Constitution, and that means getting everyone to the table - Ottawa and all the other provinces. Treaty Nations/Indigenous rights must also be addressed. The Supreme Court of Canada’s 1998 Reference re Secession of Quebec ruled that unilateral secession is illegal. A “clear majority” on a “clear question” in a referendum would create a democratic obligation to negotiate in good faith, but actual separation requires amending the Constitution. The Clarity Act (2000) codifies this: secession “would require negotiations involving at least the governments of all of the provinces and the Government of Canada.” The standard amending formula for this (the 7/50 rule) generally requires approval by the federal Parliament plus at least 7 provinces representing 50% of Canada’s population. Some legal experts debate whether unanimity might be needed for something as fundamental as breaking up the country, but broad provincial consent is unavoidable. Treaties in Alberta (primarily Treaties 6, 7, and 8) are nation-to-nation agreements between First Nations and the Crown (i.e., the federal government of Canada), signed before Alberta even existed as a province. They are protected under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. If Alberta were to separate, it would definitely impact treaty rights - things like land use, hunting and harvesting rights, resource access, even borders. That's why any separation talks would have to seriously consider and protect Aboriginal and treaty rights. The Clarity Act actually calls this out as one of the major issues that has to be dealt with if there's any talk of secession.
The former Nazi Scientist, who invented the V2 rocket, was grafted into the US deep state, with hundreds of others, which became "The Military Industrial Complex"; warned of by Eisenhower.* In 1947, after Operation HighJump* & Roswell, the National Security Act, created the Air Force The CIA, The NSA, The Joint Chiefs of Staff, oh, and with this establishment of The Intelligence Community, 'Operation Paperclip', made former Nazi Scientists, like Warner Von Braun, the new head of NASA, and the beginning of the "space program" and the start of our race to build, and improve on long-range guided ballistic missiles and, we are STILL run by those organizations. I feel like not enough people realized how much really changed, and what was created in 1947.. Whether that was the actual coup of those we now know as the deep state, or if it was made clear, when they took out Kennedy, we haven't experienced "real life", ever since. It's all been staged History, and a puppet show, all a show managed by, this group.. why is it so important that they control our reality, our perception, and even our paradigm, of what is really our "plane", of existence? What have they been up to, while we have been distracted? Where's all the space money going?..down. How much does "space" cost? Oh, idk probably billions and billions? no accountability, no audits. Just a slush fund for the Military Industrial Complex,.to develop the Technology to fool you into thinking it's aliens killing you, when u've outlived your usefulness.
A crown built behind guarded vault doors carried so many historic gems that even master jewelers were stunned when they finally saw it completed. In 1966, Farah Pahlavi prepared for a coronation meant to revive the glory of ancient Persia on the world stage. To create jewels worthy of the moment, the Iranian imperial court turned to Van Cleef & Arpels, one of the most prestigious jewelry houses in the world. But this was not an ordinary royal commission. Every gemstone had to come directly from the legendary Iranian National Treasury, protected inside the heavily guarded vaults of the Central Bank of Iran. The project quickly became one of the most ambitious and secretive jewelry creations of the twentieth century. For six intense months, Pierre Arpels repeatedly traveled between Paris and Tehran, reportedly making twenty-four journeys to personally examine and select the historic gemstones. In an extraordinary decision almost unheard of in luxury jewelry history, Van Cleef & Arpels established a temporary workshop inside the treasury itself so the priceless gems would never leave Iranian protection. There, master jewelers worked under extreme security conditions, carefully crafting a crown designed to reflect both imperial Persian heritage and modern haute joaillerie excellence. The result was not simply jewelry—it was a political symbol of power, monarchy, and national identity. The coronation crown became a masterpiece of staggering scale and craftsmanship. It contained 1,469 diamonds, 36 emeralds including a carved emerald weighing around 150 carats, 34 rubies, two massive spinels, and 105 natural pearls. Weighing nearly two kilograms, the crown shimmered with extraordinary intensity beneath ceremonial lights. Matching earrings, necklaces, and additional jewels were also created for members of the imperial family, transforming the coronation into one of the most luxurious royal spectacles of the modern era. Yet the brilliance of the jewels would soon contrast sharply with the fate of the monarchy itself. Only a little more than a decade later, the Iranian Revolution brought the imperial era to a dramatic end. While royal palaces emptied and the ruling dynasty left the country, the coronation crown survived inside Iran’s national treasury. Unlike many historic royal jewels that vanished into auctions or private collections, Farah Pahlavi’s crown remained preserved as part of the nation’s protected treasures, carrying with it the memory of the final great imperial ceremony of modern Iran. Today, the coronation parure of Farah Pahlavi is regarded as one of the greatest royal jewelry commissions ever completed. Beyond its immense diamonds and emeralds lies a deeper story of ambition, artistry, empire, and historical transformation. It remains a rare surviving symbol of a vanished royal world where ancient dynasties, political power, and extraordinary craftsmanship merged into a single breathtaking creation.
Before Gay Bars, There Were Molly Houses In the 1720s, if you were a gay man in London, you had two choices. You could live in complete silence, or you could risk everything to walk through a plain wooden door in a dark alley, whisper a password, and enter a world that didn't legally exist. Behind that door, everything changed. Men danced together. They called each other "Madam" and "Lady." They gave themselves names like Princess Seraphina, Miss Kitten, or the Duchess of Camberwell. And for a few precious hours, they were not criminals. They were home. These were the molly houses — the world's first known gay bars. The word "molly" was 18th-century slang for an effeminate or gay man. It was an insult on the street, but inside the molly house, it became a badge of belonging. The venues were usually pubs, coffeehouses, or rented rooms run by men or women who were either gay themselves or willing to risk prison for the steady business. What happened inside was extraordinary by any standard. Men would arrive in groups or alone, often after dark. They drank ale and gin. They flirted openly. Some wore women's clothing — not always full gowns, but a scarf, a petticoat, or a patch on the cheek. Others simply dropped their usual masculine posture and spoke freely for the first time in weeks. The most famous molly house ritual was the "mock wedding." Two men would stand before a makeshift altar while a third "clergyman" read a comic but affectionate script. Guests threw shoes instead of rice. Couples would exchange rings or tokens. These were not jokes. They were celebrations of love that the law would never recognize. And then there were the "molly babies." This is the detail that surprises most people. During parties, a man would stuff a pillow under his skirt, announce he was "in labor," and go into a dramatic, comedic performance of giving birth — often surrounded by other men playing midwives and gossiping aunts. The "baby" was usually another small pillow or a doll. The scene was absurd, loud, and deeply tender. It was men making fun of the very domestic life they were forbidden to have, while also secretly claiming it as their own. Police knew about the molly houses. Informants lurked in corners. Raids were brutal and frequent. Officers would burst in mid-party, arrest everyone, and drag them to court. If convicted of sodomy, a man could be hanged. Even just being found in a molly house could mean the pillory — public humiliation where crowds threw rotten food, rocks, or worse. But here is what the authorities never understood. Every time they raided a molly house, another one opened two streets over. The community was too hungry for connection to be scared away. We know the names of some of these places. Mother Clap's in Holborn, run by a woman named Margaret Clap, who was arrested in 1726 but refused to name her customers. The White Swan on Vere Street, which was destroyed by a mob in 1810. The Royal Oak, the Bull and Gate, the George and Vulture. We also know the names of the men. Thomas Newton, who performed as "Princess Seraphina" at Mother Clap's. Samuel Roper, who married another man in a mock wedding and later wept openly when arrested. John Poulter, who testified against his friends to save his own life — and was found dead in a ditch a year later. What makes molly houses so remarkable is not just that they existed. It is that they were joyful. In a century where gay men faced execution, prison, and public torture, they still found ways to dance, to laugh, to marry each other in make-believe ceremonies, and to give birth to pillow babies. That is not weakness. That is survival with style. Today, the molly house spirit lives on in every gay bar, every Pride parade, every chosen family. But it is worth remembering the original version — hidden, illegal, and utterly fearless. Long before Stonewall, there was Mother Clap's. And on a good night, if you closed your eyes, you could almost believe Princess Seraphina was singing.
BREAKING🚨 A Trump voter just told NPR he gives Trump an “A+ on everything” — then admitted gas prices are so high he and his wife are “fasting” to save money. That one call is almost too on‑the‑nose, but it fits what the numbers are screaming. Polls from NPR, Marist, Reuters, and the New York Times all show the same thing: gas prices and the Iran war are crushing people’s budgets, and most Americans — including a big chunk of Republicans — blame Trump. In one NPR/PBS/Marist survey, 81% of respondents said gas prices are a burden on their household budget. A majority flat‑out said Trump is responsible for the spike. Other polls show his economic approval underwater, his overall approval near record lows, and independents fleeing in droves. Why? Because everything in people’s lives is getting more expensive at once. Trump’s Iran war has pushed the average price of gas past $4.50 a gallon nationwide. That hits every commute, every delivery, every grocery bill. When fuel costs jump, food and rent follow. Surveys find that around two‑thirds of Americans say the war isn’t worth the financial pain, and majorities report cutting back on basics — driving less, skipping trips, delaying medical care, even skimping on groceries — just to keep up. And yet, there’s this hard core of Trump supporters telling pollsters and public radio that they’d do anything for him. They’ll call the economy “great” while they’re rationing groceries. They’ll say he’s “strong on the world stage” while his blockade drives up their own utility bills. They’ll praise his “toughness” while admitting they’re one car repair away from disaster. That’s not normal politics. That’s what it looks like when a leader convinces people that admitting pain is disloyal, so they twist themselves into knots to explain away what’s right in front of them. The truth is simple: if you’re skipping meals, working extra shifts, or draining savings to pay for gas and groceries while a billionaire president hands out slush funds and tax breaks to his friends, you’re being robbed — and then asked to say thank you. If you appreciate my posts, it would mean the world if you followed my page. Thank you for being here. BREAKING🚨 Jasmine Crockett just exposed Trump’s $1.7B slush fund as reparations for white supremacists. Trump cut a secret deal with his own Justice Department to drop a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over his leaked tax returns. In exchange, DOJ created a $1.776 billion “Anti‑Weaponization Fund” inside the Treasury’s Judgment Fund — a giant pot of taxpayer money meant to “compensate” people who say Biden’s DOJ was too mean to them. January 6 rioters, pardoned Proud Boys, MAGA influencers, and Trump officials are already lining up to file claims. It’s so blatant that two January 6 officers who defended the Capitol are suing to stop it, calling it exactly what it is: a slush fund for insurrectionists. At the same time, Trump’s DOJ is hauling the Southern Poverty Law Center into court for sending informants into white supremacist organizations — the Klan, neo‑Nazis, accelerationist groups. In other words, the government is trying to punish the people tracking domestic terrorists, while Trump’s new fund is set up to cut checks to some of the very circles that produced them. Crockett stepped up to a hearing about that SPLC case and refused to pretend those two stories were separate. “It is clear that neo‑Nazis as well as Proud Boys joined in on January 6th, yet this slush fund … is specifically to give them money,” she said. “So how dare this majority sit here and try to lecture this organization about money?” Then she went straight for the jugular: “This country still hasn’t thought that reparations made sense for Black folk in this country, but at the same time they’ve decided that people that are in organizations that are absolutely white supremacy organizations should get our tax dollars because they decided to tear apart — or attempt to tear apart — our democracy.” That’s the core hypocrisy. The same Republican majority that has blocked every reparations commission, fought against basic voting rights, and can’t even agree whether slavery should be taught as a moral evil is now defending a program that may literally write checks to people who beat Black officers on January 6. The system can’t find the political will to compensate descendants of enslaved people, or the families of those lynched and redlined and locked out of the GI Bill — but it can move at light speed to build a payout machine for Trump’s “political prisoners.” Crockett’s point is bigger than one fund or one lawsuit. It’s about who this government chooses to value. Under Trump, Black communities get voter suppression, book bans, and lectures about “law and order.” Neo‑Nazis and Proud Boys get pardons, PR campaigns, and now a shot at taxpayer money. That’s not a bug. It’s the design. “They are being rewarded,” she said of the white supremacists. She’s right. And until more elected Democrats talk like Jasmine Crockett just did — naming names, connecting the dots, and saying out loud that reparations are overdue while insurrectionists are cashing in — this slush fund will be just one more chapter in a very old American story about who gets paid and who gets played. If you appreciate my posts, it would mean the world if you followed my page. Thank you for being here.
Guru z3n8 is an Epic Ethical Art Hacker ::: This.. ladies & gentle freaks is -> FUCKTALK, on Ha.ck.er N3ws: We're testing new ad formats in Search and expanding our Direct Offers pilot https://ift.tt/uS2FGOs
New moaning and creaming orgasmic story on Hack3r News: We're testing new ad formats in Search and expanding our Direct Offers pilot https://ift.tt/YW4hA9C
BREAKING🚨 Judge just slapped Trump’s hand off the delete button — his texts have to be saved. On Wednesday, a federal judge in D.C. ordered the Trump White House to preserve ALL presidential records — including text messages between senior officials — while a lawsuit over his secretive record‑keeping moves forward. For months, Trump’s team has been acting like screenshots, Signal threads, and frantic staff texts about wars, protests, and January 6‑style security fears belong to him personally, not to the American people. The Justice Department even issued a memo saying the Presidential Records Act was basically optional, and that Trump’s texts could be treated like private notes he was free to delete. Judge John Bates wasn’t having it. His ruling temporarily blocks that memo and tells the White House, in plain English: you are still bound by the Presidential Records Act. You don’t get to unilaterally rewrite the law because it’s inconvenient. Every text about official business — from Iran strike planning, to the anti‑weaponization slush fund, to internal debates over the January 6 rioters and the “lawfare” narrative — has to be preserved while the case plays out. This is bigger than one court fight. Trump’s people have already been caught using auto‑deleting apps like Signal to discuss military operations and sensitive political schemes. Watchdog groups say key messages about airstrikes, domestic deployments, and legal strategies may already be gone. Now the White House was trying to go a step further: to formally bless the idea that anything on their phones is personal, and that the public has no right to a paper trail of how life‑and‑death decisions are made. If they got away with that, future investigators, historians, and even Congress would be staring at a black hole where the record of this presidency should be. No texts about who ordered what. No contemporaneous notes about what Trump was told and when. No receipts when officials lie later. The judge’s order doesn’t fix what’s already been deleted. But it does something crucial: it draws a line. It says a president who’s already been impeached twice, indicted multiple times, and now sits on top of a $1.8 billion slush fund does NOT get to quietly erase the evidence of what he’s doing with power. That only matters if we keep watching. If you appreciate my posts, it would mean the world if you followed my page. Thank you for being here.
Guru z3n8 is an Epic Ethical Art Hacker ::: This.. ladies & gentle freaks is -> FUCKTALK, on Ha.ck.er N3ws: Google Declaring War on the Web https://tante.cc/2026/05/20/on-google-declaring-war-on-the-web/
New moaning and creaming orgasmic story on Hack3r News: Google Declaring War on the Web https://ift.tt/whEJV3N
Guru z3n8 is an Epic Ethical Art Hacker ::: This.. ladies & gentle freaks is -> FUCKTALK, on Ha.ck.er N3ws: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale https://ift.tt/nxJG20t
New moaning and creaming orgasmic story on Hack3r News: AI is just unauthorised plagiarism at a bigger scale https://ift.tt/4KuCSvA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)