The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures…. ICE agents don’t get to kidnap someone, from a coffee shop parking lot, without reasonable suspicion or probable cause. The Fifth Amendment guarantees due process…. Holding someone against their will while refusing to tell them why, or denying them access to contact anyone, is a constitutional violation

Virtual Ministry Archive

YESTERDAY EVENING: Pierre Poilievre attacks Wab Kinew — and receives a scathing “lesson” he won’t soon forget READ HERE: 👉 https://power.fieldjournal.blog/posts/political-firestorm-viral-story-claims-wab-kinew-delivered-devastating-moral-ngatt123-team-clover-b46f-ca-w6PP Pierre Poilievre believed he could score some easy political points by labeling the prominent Wab Kinew an “offender of Jesus,” simply because the well-known figure was described as “too woke” and argued that God’s love does not discriminate based on gender. Unfortunately for the leader, he chose the wrong opponent. Standing in a venue steeped in history, the outspoken public figure didn’t just respond: he launched a powerful moral indictment with the composure and precision of a masterclass. “The leader has just declared that I am an offender of Jesus,” Wab Kinew began, his voice resonant and clear. “Do you want to know what truly offends Jesus? It is stripping healthcare away from the sick, while cutting taxes for billionaires.” And that was only the beginning. “Do you know what else offends Jesus?” he continued, with a presence that dominated the entire space. “It is deporting foreigners and ripping children from the arms of their mothers.” Then he went further, aiming at war, corruption, and hypocrisy with the searing conviction for which he is known. “Do you know what offends Jesus? It is bombing and killing innocent schoolchildren, and sending our brave soldiers — men and women — to die in endless, perpetual wars… It is covering up documents related to Epstein, and then refusing to prosecute anyone involved.” This isn’t the usual politics. It is a moral indictment. Wab Kinew — who had been criticized for his outspoken views and advocacy on sensitive cultural issues — is portrayed here as turning the tables completely. Instead of backing down, he grounded his message in the same moral language used against him. “I am not a perfect Christian,” he said with humility. “There was only one perfect Christian, and he was crucified 2,000 years ago.” And then, the most powerful statement of all resonated through the air: “Jesus taught us to love our neighbor as ourselves… Can we imagine war in Heaven? Can we imagine discrimination in Heaven? Can we imagine poverty in Heaven? Then why do we tolerate these things right here — on Earth?” This is presented as a forceful moral rebuttal. Not with insults. Not with fear. But with conviction and rhetoric that reshaped the moment. According to the circulating version of the story, the exchange quickly gained traction online, sparking wide debate about politics, morality, and public discourse.